![]() As someone who uses Chrome under Mac, Windows and Linux I applaud this move. The Quicktime plugin on Windows is HORRID. It is a prime example of how to make a user experience complete shit. ![]() Grant HutchinsonNov 28, 2014 2:24 PM Re: quicktime plugin missing from Google Chrome Re: quicktime plugin missing from Google Chrome in response to Car. I reinstalled Chrome 38.0.2125.122 from a recent backup and the QuickTime plugin is active again. The issue is caused by web browser deactivating Adobe Flash Player by default and display false errors about QuickTime plugin is required to play media. Our streaming site, is used by many viewing our monthly MacAdmin and IT Professional presentations and by campus and affiliates playing general media. If you find any PlayStation gaming emulator software then this one is designed only for you who solved your all the game problems. This software solves you all the problems with keyboard keystrokes managing. Qualities Of Pcsx4 Emulator Free Download • A user can save her own operating system fro threats. You can add special effects and moves to your gameplay. Text game emulator download mac. And to be honest I'd prefer the Mac version not pull it in automatically either. Avi video for mac. Weither it's the crashing, slow startup times, bazaar buffering behavior or taking over way too many MIME types I hate it. I strongly prefer that Chrome asked my permission before executing either the Quicktime or Java plugins just like it prompts for popups. All are annoying, buggy, laggy and crashy. Both Quicktime and Java were manually disabled globally on every browser I use and now I can feel safe leaving them on. This change makes my web browsing experience SAFER and less frustrating. Of course my dream is never to have to touch QuickTime or that horrid Apple Update garbage on Windows ever again. I'm not buying a Mac for home because Apple can't be trusted around VisualStudio. Flash gets the pass because Adobe lets Google worry about making sure updates are available on day 1. Odds of Google and Apple working together on Quicktime. QT on Windows is horrible, but disabling it outright and requiring users to start Chrome with a custom commandline, without warning and after an automatic (and hidden) update? Let's just say it did not go down well at work, where we use Chrome and QT for inhouse enterprise applications. I understand the need to push the envelope on web standards and that needs to happen at a rapid pace, but at least give us enterprise developers a chance to override it. Enterprises do not develop software at breakneck speed Google, it's just not worth it. He's definitely correct in this. Good thing Chrome also disables Flash by default. Between this and the Honeycomb source I just checked out through git, Google has really hooked me up with the mad openness. Edit: Really, though, this is a bullshit argument that's been cooked up. These are two companies trying to preserve their ability to make money. The thing I admire about Apple, though, is that they're not making any bones about it. They go with what works better for them, and, as they see it, what works better for users. No silly holy wars or sanctimonious proclamations. I trust the guy who is honest about his self-interest a whole lot more than phony altruists. Actually, it's quite possible that much of what we think of as Quicktime will go away in OSX 10.7. Apple has tried modernizing Quicktime with something called QTKit/Quicktime X. IOS did away with this altogether and instead uses something called AVFoundation. OSX 10.7 includes an OSX version of AVFoundation. It's not 100% clear to me what the relationship between the two on OSX will be, but I'm guessing that Apple has given up on modernizing Quicktime and is just replacing it with AVFoundation. Pe design 10 full version. This can't really come quickly enough. If Windows users are tired of Quicktime, well. It behaves a lot better on OSX if you're an end-user, but programming for Quicktime is a pain. In particular, programming codec plug-ins is horrible. The basic Quicktime architecture still deals with FSSpecs, memory handles, the old Component Manager, and API artifacts relating to the old code fragment manager from the pre-OSX days. Quicktime is probably the one big chunk of code in OSX that still dates from pre-OSX days and hasn't been re-implemented in terms of something more modern like Core Foundation. It may vary from nation to nation, but under US law the relevant act here is the Sherman Antitrust Act, which deals with single-firm anti-competitive behavior. We'd have to wade through a lot of case-law here, but if you'll permit me the ability to speak without excessive sourcing (most of this can be found supported and sourced on Wiki). The courts have made a distinction between an innocent and a coercive monopoly. Where innocent monopolies, as you may argue but I disagree, are what Apple has in the music player space. These are not illegal. It would need to be shown that Apple has conspired in some way to grow and maintain their market position in a way to be detrimental to consumers and other producers. Now on to whether it is a monopoly or not. This page can be helpful: Right now another consumer electronics company could: a) produce a new unit with a high quality software, b) sell it at a competitive price point to Apple, c) create a product very similar to the iPod itself, d) there already exist many other competitors. To me these factors suggest Apple does not have a monopoly but a very successful product.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |